• Front Page
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Illustration of algorithmic objectivity

Illustration of algorithmic objectivity, generated in ImageFX

Computing discussion topic

May 23, 2025

Something to discuss with your students...

Objectivity and bias in algorithms

As a preamble, permit me to begin with this quote from Jamie McKenzie’s Questioning Toolkit. It was published in 1997, which probably sounds like the =Dark Ages, and wasn’t especially focused on education technology. It is still a great source of ideas and inspiration though.

"When inspired by a desire to understand the Truth, Provocative Questions play a positive role in debunking propaganda, mythologies, hype, bandwagons and the Big Lie. They help us to remove the "bunk" or "claptrap" and determine if there is any substance worth considering. In a time of what Toffler calls "info-tactics" such questions become an essential tool for any citizen in a democratic society.

In an age of info-glut and info-garbage, we must equip students with questions which enable them to separate out meaning from all the competing variants of BLATHER (quoted here from Roget's Thesaurus). . .

empty talk, idle speeches, sweet nothings, endearments, wind, gas, hot air, vaporing, verbiage, DIFFUSENESS

rant, ranting and raving, bombast, fustian, rodomontade, BOASTING

blether, blather, blah-blah-blah, flimflam

guff, hogwash, eyewash, claptrap, poppycock, FABLE

humbug, FALSEHOOD

malarkey, hokum, bunkum, bunk, baloney, hooey

flummery, blarney, FLATTERY

sales talk, patter, sales patter, spiel

talk, chatter, prattle, prating, yammering, babble, gabble, jabber, jibber jabber, jaw, yackety-yak, yak yak, rhubarb, CHATTER"

Now on to algorithms…

People who know about programming know that programming isn't as objective as it may appear to be.

Here's an interesting article that makes that point:

Technology is neither magical nor neutral

That article was published in 2016. Interestingly, it contains the sentence:

“Algorithms, strangely enough, are written by humans. ”
— Gerry McGovern

Of course, that is not necessarily the case any more, because AI can do a lot, if not all, of the heavy lifting. But is the basic point still apposite? After all, an AI-written algorithm is, surely, a human-written one at one remove?

Is the article accurate? Does it matter?

In Computing, News & views, Discussion topic, AI Tags discussion, algorithms, bias, objectivity, AI, Artificial Intelligence
← Collective nostalgia about computer programming22 reasons that education technology projects fail →
Recent book reviews
a little history of the earth.jpg
One for your Geography colleagues perhaps? Review: A Little History of the Earth -- two reviews in one!
Read more →
a word for all seasons.jpg
For your English colleagues: A Word for all Seasons -- two reviews in one!
Read more →
the mending.jpg
For your maths colleagues: The Mending of Broken Bones: A Modern Guide to Classical Algebra -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
the worst exhibition.jpg
For your History colleagues: The Worst Exhibition in the World: Degenerate Art, 1937 -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
History lesson, by Terry Freedman.jpg
Is The computing Curriculum Too Masculine? Revisited 16 years later!

One of the apparently insoluble problems of the age is how do you encourage more girls to take up Computing? I think a lot can be done, and have done so myself, but I wonder how far a lot of the effort fails to get to the heart of the issue, which could be the curriculum itself, the way it is taught, or a combination of the two?

Read more →
best writing maths.jpg
Book review: The best writing on mathematics, 2016

I think this could be an excellent resource for teachers of mathematics.

Read more →
international short (2).jpg
For your Eng Lit colleagues? The Penguin Book of the International Short Story -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote!

Read more →
Turner and Constable (1).jpg
Two reviews in one: Turner and Constable: Rivals and Originals -- art and history

One for your colleagues, perhaps: art, art history, ploitics with a small ‘p’.

Read more →
satire (1).jpg
Two reviews in one: State of Ridicule: A History of Satire in English Literature -- politics, history, English

One for your colleagues, perhaps. Sperrin has provided a wealth of information that can be used to provide a rich experience for students of politics, history and English literature.

Read more →
a little history of maths.jpg
Two reviews in one: A Little History of Mathematics

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved