­
Can the International Society of Technology in Education's Standards in Computing be adapted for use in the UK? — ICT & Computing in Education
  • Front Page
  • Search
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Search
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Partners. This illustration is from www.pixabay.com and has a CC0 licence.

Partners. This illustration is from www.pixabay.com and has a CC0 licence.

Can the International Society of Technology in Education's Standards in Computing be adapted for use in the UK?

May 9, 2019

Exploratory chats with ISTE: was collaboration feasible?

Just before the summer break in 2018 I had a few exploratory chats with some contacts I have in the International Society of Technology in Education, or ISTE. I can’t who started the ball rolling — I think both parties made contact with each other because it was the right time. ISTE wanted to find ways of working with UK educators, and I felt that the Association for Information Technology in Teacher Education (ITTE) and the Technology, Pedagogy and Education Association (TPEA) could form a useful partnership with ISTE.

Some key information

Before I go any further, there are two pieces of information to share with you. First, I’m on the committee of both organisations. Secondly, ITTE, together with part of Mirandanet, is in the process of morphing into the TPEA, which is a new organisation.

Further exploration and discussion

After the initial couple of chats I had with my ISTE colleagues, I presented a report to the ITTE committee. On the basis of that report and my recommendations, we decided it was worth spending more time looking into ways of collaborating. Another online meeting was arranged between myself, two people in ISTE and two more people from ITTE — Professor Christina Preston and Professor Sarah Younie. (You can see their mini-biography and mine on the TPEA’s Conference Committee page.)

Standards

ISTE has various sets of ‘Standards’. One thing they said we could do if we liked was to adopt and adapt those Standards for teachers in the UK.

There are two that are of particular interest:

  • Standards for Computer Science Educators and

  • Computational Thinking Competencies.

As a result of our discussions, we all decided that a good next step would be to see if UK educators thought that those sets of Standards could be adopted by UK teachers. I took charge of that investigation, and did the following.

First, I asked in the ITTE and Mirandanet email discussion lists whether anyone was interested in exploring this issue. As a result I now have a small but perfectly formed working group of people who have an interest in this. At least one person has experience of trying to use the Standards to teach Computer Science in England.

Secondly, I asked the group if they could complete a short form online in which they could say whether each set of Standards referred to above could adapted, adapted with some work, or not really adaptable at all etc. In other words, the aim of this part of the work was to get a sense of whether or not the idea of using ISTE’s Standards over here was an idea worth pursuing. So far, the responses that have come through are interesting, but I’m not yet in a position to summarise them.

What next?

If the responses suggest that the Standards could be adapted for use here, we’ll need to get down to working on them. So far, I’ve been keen to avoid face-to-face meetings because of the costs in time and money. However, once the next phase of this project starts (if indeed it does), I imagine this asynchronous online-only will need to be revisited.

Over to you

If you have had experience of using the ISTE Standards referred to above, we’d find it useful to have your opinion about them. If you can spare ten minutes or less to tell us what you think, that would be fantastic. The form is just below. Thanks in advance!

Our findings

I’m hoping that we will be in a position to present our findings at the TPEA conference in July. Why not join us? Click the picture below for details.

Click the pic for details of our summer conference.

Click the pic for details of our summer conference.


In News & views, Research, Using and Teaching Computing & ICT, Leading & Managing Computing & ICT Tags ISTE, ISTE Standards, ITTE, TPEA, collaboration, Standards
← Book review: Access 2019 BibleBook review: How to think like a coder →
Recent book reviews
Review: Social Media for Academics
Review: Social Media for Academics

This book is very readable, and if I sound surprised that is because it’s not always true of academics!

Read More →
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example

For the time being, this book is free in Kindle format.

Read More →
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too

Despite the relative paucity of immediately obvious National Curriculum links, teachers will find several of sections of this book to be highly engaging.

Read More →
Review: The Dictators: 64 Dictators, 64 Authors, 64 Warnings from History
Review: The Dictators: 64 Dictators, 64 Authors, 64 Warnings from History

In some respects one could view this book as a single warning repeated 64 times.

Read More →
Review: The Bookshop, The Draper, The Candlestick Maker: A History of the High Street 
Review: The Bookshop, The Draper, The Candlestick Maker: A History of the High Street 

Taking readers from the Middle Ages to (more or less) the present day, Gray charts how the places where we do our shopping and what we buy have changed over the centuries.

Read More →
Review: Extraordinary Learning For All
Review: Extraordinary Learning For All

As a source of potential ideas and inspiration, the book could be very useful indeed.

Read More →
Review: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them
Review: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them

One has the impression that the main role of the university these days is to maximise profit, while that of the majority of teaching staff is to ensure the ‘correct’ views are passed on to students. All the while, students’ main concern seems to be to seek protection from anything that might make them feel unsafe.

Read More →
Review: Next Practices - An Executive Guide for Education Decision Makers
Review: Next Practices - An Executive Guide for Education Decision Makers

Is a 2014 book on managing the computing provision in a school still worth buying?

Read More →
Still relevant (sadly): How to lie with statistics, by Darrell Huff
Still relevant (sadly): How to lie with statistics, by Darrell Huff

Although this book is over 60 years old, it is remarkably apposite for our times -- and especially in the fields of educational research and assessing pupils' understanding and progress.

Read More →
Quick looks: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them
Quick looks: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them

It was a great source of pride to me, getting hundreds of students through their A levels and encouraging them to go to university. But for some time I have asked myself a question: would I recommend this route now?

Read More →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved