• Articles
  • Search this site
    • Courses
    • Course Testimonials
    • Terry Freedman's Plain and Simple Guides
    • Reviews of Terry Freedman's Books
    • Digital Education
    • Digital Education Archive
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS etc
    • The "About" Page
    • The services I offer
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Articles
  • Search this site
  • Courses
    • Courses
    • Course Testimonials
  • Books
    • Terry Freedman's Plain and Simple Guides
    • Reviews of Terry Freedman's Books
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Digital Education Archive
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS etc
  • Information
    • The "About" Page
    • The services I offer
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
ICT+Direct.gif
Photo by  rawpixel  on  Unsplash

Photo by rawpixel on Unsplash

Politics and education technology reviews

February 12, 2019

Given that I don’t much like being lectured to by perfect strangers on issues such as Brexit, Trump, etc etc ad nauseum, I tend to assume that nobody wishes to be lectured by me. For this reason, I try to keep my political views to myself.

However, I do wonder how far this is actually possible, even in an article as seemingly innocuous as a book review. I’m aware, for example, of the political bias of some publications, and their reviews tend to reflect that. But it seems to me that on some level and in some way, even reviewing a book about how we learn is bound to contain some bias, despite all attempts to avoid it or at least prevent it from being intrusive.

This was brought home forcefully to me a few years ago when I came across David Foster Wallace’s “review” of a dictionary of American Usage. His article proper begins as follows:

Did you know that probing the seamy underbelly of U.S. lexicography reveals ideological strife and controversy and intrigue and nastiness and fervour on a near-Lewinskian scale? For instance, did you know that some modem dictionaries are notoriously liberal and others notoriously conservative, and that certain conservative dictionaries were actually conceived' and designed as corrective responses to the "corruption"and "permissiveness" of certain liberal dictionaries?

I have a number of questions to which I have, as yet, no answers:

  1. Is there any such thing as a neutral review of a book concerned with learning or technology? I’m not referring to the book itself, but to the way it’s reviewed.

  2. Does it matter?

  3. Should the writer declare his or her bias upfront?

  4. Would the absence of neutrality, or any attempt to disguise that fact, actually serve to enhance the review in some way?


Google Ads

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
In News & views, Thinking aloud, Reviews Tags bias, reviews, politics, David Foster Wallace
← Have Ada Lovelace in your Computing or education technology classroomDiscipline in the classroom: what, why and how (Updated) →

Like to work with me? Click the button below for more information.

Work with Terry Freedman
Free  newsletter: click the pic for info.

Free newsletter: click the pic for info.

Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved