• Front Page
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Click the cover to see the book on Amazon UK (affiliate link)

Click the cover to see the book on Amazon UK (affiliate link)

How reliable is neuroscience?

July 20, 2020

For several years now the flavour of the month, so to speak, in education circles has been neuroscience. I tend to be rather sceptical of anything that smacks of a panacea, whether that is in the sense of a cure for all ills or, as in this case, an approach. I suppose one might call this a Marxist approach — not Karl, but Groucho, who refused to join any club that would have someone like him as a member.

This is not a new departure for me. In 2014 I was happy to publish a guest article called Neurodeterminism As An Antidote To Common Sense? I Doubt It! And, more recently, in my review of Teachers vs Tech? I wrote:

“...much of the research drawn upon lies in the field of neuroscience, and I have to say that I remain sceptical about its efficacy. That is in no small part because we keep discovering that the things we thought we knew about the workings of the brain turned out to be working assumptions. I’m afraid I can’t give you any examples, except to say that some of the psychology books I studied when I was younger are now regarded as almost akin to fiction. Ditto the biology books I used to find out how the brain works. So I can’t help thinking: will studies carried out in a few years’ time disprove, or at least call into doubt, a lot of the current revelations in that field?”
— Terry Freedman

I feel somewhat vindicated by the statistic apparently cited in Science Fictions that 10% of studies in neuroscience were found to be flawed. (I say “apparently” because I haven’t read the book myself yet.) I realise that the corollary of this finding is that 90% of the studies were not flawed, but how does the average teacher know which ones they are?

Add to the problem of flawed research the fact that the research is often reported very poorly (see Read All About It: What Does The Research REALLY Say?), and it’s very difficult to know what to believe unless you go to the trouble of verifying it for yourself.

Anyway, it seems to me that this book is very timely, given all the conflicting evidence regarding Covid-19 at the moment. Its full title is Science Fictions: Exposing Fraud, Bias, Negligence and Hype in Science, and it is not concerned specifically with education from what I’ve read about it, but it sounds like a useful book to consult. Also, as I said earlier, I haven’t read it yet (give me a chance: it was only published on 16 July 2020), and for all I know it may be unreadable rubbish, so caveat emptor!

If you found this article interesting and useful, why not subscribe to my newsletter, Digital Education? It’s been going since the year 2000, and has news, views and reviews for Computing and ed tech teachers.

In Books Unseen, News & views, Research Tags Science Fictions, science, research
← When it comes to PR, learn from the worstWhat next for UK Copyright? →
Recent book reviews
a little history of the earth.jpg
One for your Geography colleagues perhaps? Review: A Little History of the Earth -- two reviews in one!
Read more →
a word for all seasons.jpg
For your English colleagues: A Word for all Seasons -- two reviews in one!
Read more →
the mending.jpg
For your maths colleagues: The Mending of Broken Bones: A Modern Guide to Classical Algebra -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
the worst exhibition.jpg
For your History colleagues: The Worst Exhibition in the World: Degenerate Art, 1937 -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
History lesson, by Terry Freedman.jpg
Is The computing Curriculum Too Masculine? Revisited 16 years later!

One of the apparently insoluble problems of the age is how do you encourage more girls to take up Computing? I think a lot can be done, and have done so myself, but I wonder how far a lot of the effort fails to get to the heart of the issue, which could be the curriculum itself, the way it is taught, or a combination of the two?

Read more →
best writing maths.jpg
Book review: The best writing on mathematics, 2016

I think this could be an excellent resource for teachers of mathematics.

Read more →
international short (2).jpg
For your Eng Lit colleagues? The Penguin Book of the International Short Story -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote!

Read more →
Turner and Constable (1).jpg
Two reviews in one: Turner and Constable: Rivals and Originals -- art and history

One for your colleagues, perhaps: art, art history, ploitics with a small ‘p’.

Read more →
satire (1).jpg
Two reviews in one: State of Ridicule: A History of Satire in English Literature -- politics, history, English

One for your colleagues, perhaps. Sperrin has provided a wealth of information that can be used to provide a rich experience for students of politics, history and English literature.

Read more →
a little history of maths.jpg
Two reviews in one: A Little History of Mathematics

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved