­
From AM to AI -- or why teachers should embrace the robot revolution — ICT & Computing in Education
  • Front Page
  • Search
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Search
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Teachers of the future? I don't think so. Picture from pixabay.com Licence: CCO

Teachers of the future? I don't think so. Picture from pixabay.com Licence: CCO

From AM to AI -- or why teachers should embrace the robot revolution

February 13, 2018

The robots are coming. No doubt about that. I heard today on the radio that robots can examine 24 potatoes a second to check their quality, and that is just one example of how robots and AI have become part of our lives. The question is: will robots or AI ever replace teachers?

I think the best way of approaching this question is to think in terms of tasks rather than jobs. As someone on Twitter said recently (unfortunately, I didn't keep a record of the tweet):

"Bring on the bots so that I can get on with my job."

What did he mean?

The best way I can explain it, I think, is to look back at how things used to be in my early teaching career. Everything was labour-intensive. At the end of each term I would have to sit down and calculate the absences and latenesses of each student in my form group -- around 30 students in all. It took ages, and not least because st that time electronic calculators cost around £5, equivalent to around £35 in 2016. I can't recall what my income or living expenses were in those days, but £35 would have represented a large chunk of them.

In other words, all that calculation had to be done manually. Yes, it was possible to devise workarounds. For example, if I knew that the maximum (and ideal) number of 'presents' was 100, all I had to do was count the blank spaces. It still took ages. Think about it: 2 minutes per student times 30 students equals one hour. If you were interrupted halfway through you'd have to start again. Invariably, one student's records would be so arcane (marked absent, then present, then late etc) that sometimes you'd be held up for half an hour just on that one person.

And that was assuming the register could be located in the first place. Sometimes you'd send some urchin to bring the register and they would either spend half an hour in the toilet on the way back or, afterwards, stick the register in their satchel and forget about it.

Do you think I started sobbing when registration and related matters started to be automated? Don't make me laugh!

Same with marking. That can be pretty labour-intensive too, especially if most of the work submitted by students is in the form of essays. I found work-arounds for that as well, to some extent. For example, I'd ask the students to go through each other's essays looking for particular points. Actually, the intention was to give them an insight into the examination marking process, and I would still mark the work afterwards, so it didn't save time at all.

A better approach was self-assessment and peer assessment for certain types of work. But I was very pleased when automated marking (my 'AM' in the title of this piece) came along for simple assessments like vocabulary tests, because that enabled me to spend time discussing with the class the bits that lots of them had got wrong.

This isn't intended to be a starry-eyed trip down memory lane. The sort of admin I've been describing was drudgery. True, it enabled conversations to take place ("You seem to have been off every other Friday"; "You don't seem to have done very well on that glossary test"), but not deep conversations ("You seem to have been off school every other Friday, which happens to coincide with when your girlfriend in the year below was absent too."; "Your test marks improved a lot soon after you did that work experience and took on a Saturday job. How come?").

I see AI as being a logical extension of automated registration and automated marking. A well-designed bot would be able to undertake calculations at speed, and to weigh up many disparate factors at the same time when it came to assessing a student's overall performance. Imagine the amount of time and energy freed up, and the information provided, to enable you and your students, and their parents and your colleagues, to have really meaningful conversations.

Why am I not too worried about bots taking over as teachers? After all, there are bots that simulate emotional intelligence and empathy quite well. I think it's to do with adjustment, or fine-tuning. I was reading an article by Matthew Syed recently entitled Artificial intelligence will change the world, but it can’t win at darts. The article is behind a paywall unfortunately, but the nub of what he was saying was that  darts looks like exactly the kind of thing that can be automated. So many things are fixed -- the size and weight of the dart, the position of the dartboard, to distance to the dartboard -- that it shouldn't take AI long to work out the optimum trajectory and velocity and so on when throwing the dart. It turns out, however, that what human darts players do is make very subtle adjustments according to variations in temperature, pressure and the slipperiness of the dart.

I believe that teachers, good ones at least, posses an analogous ability to judge a situation and respond accordingly. And in my opinion, they'd be able to do so even better if they had access to the sort of wide-ranging and deep analysis that AI is able to provide.

Related articles
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution
Jul 7, 2025
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution
Jul 7, 2025

The title of this book invites curiosity: what were the other three ‘revolutions?

Jul 7, 2025
Computing discussion topic
May 23, 2025
Computing discussion topic
May 23, 2025

A topic to discuss with your students perhaps: the hidden bias in algorithms.

May 23, 2025
On this day: Do kids still need to learn how to code?
Apr 30, 2025
On this day: Do kids still need to learn how to code?
Apr 30, 2025

A week or so ago we were chatting to a neighbour. She said she thinks her daughter, who looked about six years old, should learn how to code, as that’s the future. Didn’t I agree? I’m afraid I said that didn’t.

Apr 30, 2025
An AI experiment to summarise student feedback
Mar 26, 2025
An AI experiment to summarise student feedback
Mar 26, 2025

An AI summary of feedback received on a course.

Mar 26, 2025
The DfE's foray into AI for education: the good news and the (potentilly) bad news
Mar 20, 2025
The DfE's foray into AI for education: the good news and the (potentilly) bad news
Mar 20, 2025

We don’t have very long to wait before the educational AI projects funded by the Department for Education are unveiled, if all goes to plan. But I have some concerns.

Mar 20, 2025
When AI can write as well as this, I'll worry! Plus a prize competition.
Mar 18, 2025
When AI can write as well as this, I'll worry! Plus a prize competition.
Mar 18, 2025

To paraphrase what Arthur C Clarke said about teachers, any writer that can be replaced by a computer probably should be.

Mar 18, 2025
Dystopian visions: Computers don't argue (Updated with reference to AI)
Oct 16, 2024
Dystopian visions: Computers don't argue (Updated with reference to AI)
Oct 16, 2024

The writer does an excellent job of both reflecting the annoyance of dealing with a computer program that has no flexibility as well as no intelligence, and highlighting the need for programs to invite human input when the consequences of not doing so can be catastrophic.

Oct 16, 2024
Shape of the Future: How education system leaders can respond to the provocations of AI
Oct 7, 2024
Shape of the Future: How education system leaders can respond to the provocations of AI
Oct 7, 2024

I used Google’s Notebook LM to summarise this report. I have done this to bring the report and its main points to your attention, and to put Notebook LM through its paces.

Oct 7, 2024
The human touch
Oct 3, 2024
The human touch
Oct 3, 2024

I’ve been experimenting a lot with using AI, especially for summarising long documents. But the summaries lacked the human touch.

Oct 3, 2024
The KCL Report on the future of Computing Education
Oct 1, 2024
The KCL Report on the future of Computing Education
Oct 1, 2024

The Computing curriculum report from Kings College makes some great recommendations for fixing the failures of the current curriculum.

Oct 1, 2024
In Leading & Managing Computing & ICT, News & views Tags artifical intelligence, AI, robots, admin
← Creating a culture of innovation, part 5: BudgetsNot too late to enter a prize draw for one of three Computing in education books →
Recent book reviews
Backlist: The Written World
Backlist: The Written World

Writing was invented ‘only’ a few thousand years ago. It’s a fascinating story.

Read More →
Backlist: What I'm reading: Bounce
Backlist: What I'm reading: Bounce

What does it take to become an expert? And what can the Computing teacher do about it?

Read More →
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution

The title of this book invites curiosity: what were the other three ‘revolutions?

Read More →
A book review for your English department colleagues perhaps
A book review for your English department colleagues perhaps

Some of these stories are so richly told, it can almost seem as though you’re right there with him.

Read More →
Review: Pen Names
Review: Pen Names

OK, so this has nothing to do with education technology, but we all read (I hope!). A very interesting examination of the pen names some authors have adopted, and why.

Read More →
Review: The Library of Ancient Wisdom: Mesopotamia and the Making of History
Review: The Library of Ancient Wisdom: Mesopotamia and the Making of History

There's a really interesting section in this book about how ceramic storage of data and information is probably the most likely medium to stand the test of time.

Read More →
A book review for your biology colleagues perhaps
A book review for your biology colleagues perhaps

The subject under discussion here is how human physiology has developed in different ways, in response to different conditions around the world.

Read More →
Review: Social Media for Academics
Review: Social Media for Academics

This book is very readable, and if I sound surprised that is because it’s not always true of academics!

Read More →
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example

For the time being, this book is free in Kindle format.

Read More →
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too

Despite the relative paucity of immediately obvious National Curriculum links, teachers will find several of sections of this book to be highly engaging.

Read More →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved