­
National Coding Week: why? (Updated) — ICT & Computing in Education
  • Front Page
  • Search
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Search
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy

Question mark - Terry Freedman

National Coding Week: why? (Updated)

September 21, 2022

In this article…

  • Introduction
  • Who is it aimed at?
  • Why coding? Why not typing?
  • What’s the problem?
  • An example of the programming process in practice
  • Concluding remarks

Introduction

This week is National Coding Week for 2022. I have a few questions about it, which are the same as the ones I asked last year. But first, a couple of things to note:

  • Parts of the website haven’t been updated, with links pointing to items that were published last year. The links to stuff a couple of schools are doing are from 2020. One of the links is a dud link to a digital skills challenge. I don’t think this is a great advert.

  • In one section of the website there is a statement to the effect that as the person who started this is retiring, this may be the last national coding week. Well, no initiative should be dependent on the involvement of a single individual in my opinion.

  • I’ve never liked the idea of a coding week, partly because I think the emphasis should be on programming, and partly because I disagree with the implication (and sometimes explicitly stated expectation) that everybody should learn to “code”. Still, being the magnanimous bloke I am, I’ve publicised the website (see above) in case you might find something useful or inspiring there. If so, knock yourself out. Anyway, what follows are my objections, for what they’re worth.

Who is it aimed at?

It seems to be for both adults and kids. If adults are part of the target audience, why would we want them to learn to “code”? It reminds me of a training session I was asked to run by a school, the aim being to teach people how to edit HTML. There was a handful of teachers, but in addition there was the school caretaker, kitchen staff and assorted others — none of whom had the slightest interest in editing HTML. They’d been dragooned into attending because someone in the school thought it was important to gain this so-called 21st century skill.

If it’s aimed at kids too, which it seems to be, what do the organisers think schools have been doing in the last few decades?

Why coding? Why not typing?

I can see there might be some sense in promoting the learning of computer programming to the general public (This is my attempt at being generous), but coding? That’s just one part of programming, and arguably the most boring part. If you want to teach a useful skill, I suggest touch typing, because you can use it for anything — including “coding”.

What’s the problem?

In the main section of the website, the activity is to make a thirty second video. My questions here are:

  • What’s the transferable skill, and is it to do with programming or maths?

  • What do the organisers think schools have been doing? I worked with primary schools thirty years ago who were doing this, and schools are still doing it now. It doesn’t seem to me to be the original and exciting activity that one would hope to see on a special “National Coding Week” website.

I’ve always been of the strong opinion that (a) people should talk about programming, not coding, and (b) people learn best on a kind of need to know basis. By that I mean, teach a few concepts, see how they work in a small program, and then use that knowledge and experience to solve particular problems.

An example of the programming process in practice

For example, when I decided to create a staff rota system for running a computing surgery, I didn’t just start “coding”. I went through several stages:

  1. What do I want the rota system to be able to do?

  2. Is there an affordable off-the-shelf system that I could install on our network?

  3. As the answer to #2 was “No”, should I create my own using a programming language, or use Access or Excel?

  4. Having decided Excel would be more appropriate, I asked myself: what can I achieve through functions and formulae, and where would it be best to use code?

I then set to work creating a semi-automated rota system that used a combination of Excel’s built-in functions and my own custom code.

Concluding remarks

I’m sure the people who are behind National Coding Week mean well. However, the website gives me the impression of having been cobbled together by people who have no idea of the great work going on in schools, and with no clear idea of who they are targetting or what they hope to achieve.


If you found this article interesting or useful (or even both!), why not subscribe to my free newsletter, Digital Education? It’s been going since the year 2000, and has slow news, informed views and honest reviews for Computing and ed tech teachers — and useful experience-based tips.

In Computing, News & views Tags National Coding Week, coding
← Lessons from the world of sports: #2 The rule of detailed analysis (Updated)Lessons from the world of sports: #1 The 1% improvement rule (Updated) →
Recent book reviews
Backlist: The Written World
Backlist: The Written World

Writing was invented ‘only’ a few thousand years ago. It’s a fascinating story.

Read More →
Backlist: What I'm reading: Bounce
Backlist: What I'm reading: Bounce

What does it take to become an expert? And what can the Computing teacher do about it?

Read More →
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution

The title of this book invites curiosity: what were the other three ‘revolutions?

Read More →
A book review for your English department colleagues perhaps
A book review for your English department colleagues perhaps

Some of these stories are so richly told, it can almost seem as though you’re right there with him.

Read More →
Review: Pen Names
Review: Pen Names

OK, so this has nothing to do with education technology, but we all read (I hope!). A very interesting examination of the pen names some authors have adopted, and why.

Read More →
Review: The Library of Ancient Wisdom: Mesopotamia and the Making of History
Review: The Library of Ancient Wisdom: Mesopotamia and the Making of History

There's a really interesting section in this book about how ceramic storage of data and information is probably the most likely medium to stand the test of time.

Read More →
A book review for your biology colleagues perhaps
A book review for your biology colleagues perhaps

The subject under discussion here is how human physiology has developed in different ways, in response to different conditions around the world.

Read More →
Review: Social Media for Academics
Review: Social Media for Academics

This book is very readable, and if I sound surprised that is because it’s not always true of academics!

Read More →
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example

For the time being, this book is free in Kindle format.

Read More →
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too

Despite the relative paucity of immediately obvious National Curriculum links, teachers will find several of sections of this book to be highly engaging.

Read More →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved