• Front Page
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Photo by Mimi Thian on Unsplash

Photo by Mimi Thian on Unsplash

How to run a consultation: A cynic's guide

March 24, 2026

This was originally published on March 24, 2019. Nothiing that has happened since has caused me to change my views.

If you want to run a consultation but are concerned that the outcome might not be to your liking, you need to word the questionnaire very carefully. Or rather, you need to ensure that there is as little opportunity as possible for respondents to voice their disagreement with the proposal in question.

This should be obvious from the fact that in at least two recent consultations undertaken by the government in England, a spokesperson has announced that the thing under discussion will be implemented once the consultation process is over. That sort of suggests that the thing is going to go ahead come what may.

There’s a consultation going on near where I live about a proposal to build a new school and a housing complex. There is one question that gives you the space to disagree — an open-ended “Any other comments?” one at the end. All the others are in the nature of “Which of the following benefits of this idea do you think is the most important?”. I mention this because it’s not just government consultations that have such shortcomings.

I always take part in consultations because I think that if you don’t then (a) you can’t really complain if things turn out the way you wish they hadn’t, and (b) it will only be a question of time before some bean counter in the Treasury concludes that given the low response rate to consultations, the costs outweigh the benefits.

But what I do is answer the questions that I think should have been asked, and let rip in the “Any other comments?” section.

For example, in answer to the “Which of these benefits is #1?” question I mentioned earlier, I added another option: None of the above. I don’t suppose it will be recorded, because there won’t be a slot for that kind of response in their database, but I thought it important to state anyway.

In any case, I state my full case in the Comments question, going on to a new sheet if necessary.

I also photograph my completed questionnaire if it’s on paper, or save, copy/paste or screenshot it if it’s online.

There is a third option sometimes, which is to follow up in an email. I think it’s important to do that too if possible.

Unfortunately, although the organisations that consult using leading questions may gain a short-term and private advantage, I believe the long-term and social cost is an increase of cynicism and distrust. It’s a very short-sighted strategy.

In News & views Tags consultation, leading questions
← If you stop fiddling, will Rome stop burning?Do newsletters, websites or other online resources need to be super-fancy? →
Recent book reviews
When.jpg
Review: When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing

Hopefully, neither you nor I will ever find ourselves in court, undergoing a medical procedure, or taking an important exam.

Read more →
finding fibonacci.jpg
Review: Finding Fibonacci: The Quest to Rediscover the Forgotten Mathematical Genius Who Changed the World

Finding Fibonacci is a memoir of the authors’ quest to find out about Fibonacci.

Read more →
The Teachers' Standards in Primary Schools.jpg
Quick look: The Teachers' Standards in Primary Schools

This is very well set out. It takes each standard, and gives you ideas on how to achieve it, and what success in this context looks like.

Read more →
How Computer Games Help Children learn.jpg
Quick look: How Computer Games Help Children learn

When I was teaching Econnures I realised that I could have taught quite a chunk of the synabus if I'd been able to run Sim City on the school network.

Read more →
Reinventing Project-Based learning.jpg
Quick look: Reinventing Project-Based Learning

I can verify from first hand experience that PBL kept students highly engaged, and helped them to develop skills such as working with others and independent research.

Read more →
The human touch.jpg
Quick look: The Human Touch

Although this book is published by the BCS, the Chartered Institute for IT, the focus is not on IT at all.

Read more →
Better Living through science.jpg
Quick look: Better Living through science

I have often thought that I would have been much more interested in science at school, and been much more successful at it, had the teachers taught us anything of practical value.

Read more →
Tubes.jpg
Quick look: Tubes: Behind the scenes at the internet

We are all so accustomed to using the internet, searching the world wide web — "going online" — that most of us most of the time probably do not stop to consider the question: yes, but where exactly is it?

Read more →
profits, prophets.jpg
Quick look: Profits, Prophets, Coaches and Kings: (When) do leaders make a difference?

I have somewhat dichotomous views of this question of whether leaders make a difference, or much of a difference.

Read more →
power up.jpg
Review: Power Up, by Matthew Lane

This book looks at the maths concepts — and, to some extent, the physics concepts — hidden in popular video games.

Read more →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved