­
Computing options at GCSE: interim survey results — ICT & Computing in Education
  • Front Page
  • Search
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Search
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
A word cloud of the GCSE options that schools are offering in Computing and related subjects

A word cloud of the GCSE options that schools are offering in Computing and related subjects

Computing options at GCSE: interim survey results

May 24, 2016

A couple of weeks ago I launched a survey to find out what GCSE options schools were offering to their students. In return for completing the survey, you receive an up-to-date list of officially approved qualifications in Computer Science and other digital technology subjects. If you would like to take part in the survey and by so doing acquire this marvellous freebie, here is the link:

ICT and Computing Qualifications Survey

Actually, that's the link even if you don't wish to take part in the survey, but you know what I mean.

Anyway, here are some initial results. Bear in mind that I haven't had the chance to send out this "call to action" in my own newsletter, Digital Education, yet, so these results may change once I've done that.

The big picture

First thing to do is look at the word cloud above. I thought that would be the easiest way of conveying the gist of what schools are doing. As you can, Computer Science is the main offering, with the European Computer Driving Licence (ECDL) a close second (perhaps unsurprisingly given that one organisation has claimed to be able to get students through it in three days -- see this news article).

The ECDL is a skills-based course. Cambridge Nationals is a vocational, business-oriented alternative to the (soon-to-be-scrapped) ICT qualification, and that, too, is extremely popular. As you can see, it is more or less neck and neck with the ECDL.

I think it's encouraging that some schools   are offering skills and vocational alternatives (or additions) to the more academic Computer Science. (Don't forget: in theory you can offer any approved subject from the third "bucket" of Progress 8. That means that you could offer Computer Science from the second "bucket", which would count towards the eBacc, and a more vocational option in the third "bucket". I say "in theory" because in practice much will depend on the senior leadership team -- and the head of department's ability and willingness to "sell" the other options.)

Cambridge iMedia is popular too, as you can see from the word cloud, though apparently less so than the others I've already mentioned.

Some statistics

To put some numbers to these findings, 85% of respondents are going to be offering Computer Science GCSE, while 72% will be offering a computing-related option from the third "bucket". The reason that these figures add up to more than 100% is, of course, that schools can offer more than one computing option.

The reasons given for offering Computer Science includes "academic rigour" and the EBacc. Reasons for offering alternatives include "engages girls and boys across ability ranges" and "suitable to the needs of the target audience".

The long-term view

As an eternal optimist I see the demise of ICT as an opportunity. Like the discarding of Levels in the context of assessment, it should act as a catalyst to rethink one's approach. Looking at the list of approved qualifications, there are some interesting and exciting-looking alternatives.

Some schools have reformed their Key Stage 3 curriculum in the light of the requirements of Key Stage 4. There is a danger that doing this at too early a stage could perhaps serve to narrow an individual's choices, so flexibility should be built into the system. On the other hand, taking, in effect, five years to cover a GCSE subject should yield very good results. Certainly that proved to be the case when I adopted such a strategy, ie introducing GCSE-type work and questions into Year 7 and beyond.

I will be publishing the results of the survey soon after the forthcoming half-term I hope. If you wish to take part in it, and acquire the list of approved qualifications by so doing, then once again the link is: ICT and Computing Qualifications Survey.

There has already been a sizeable response to the survey, but obviously the more responses the better, so please do take part if you have not done so already. I've designed the survey in such a way as to not take up too much of your time.

Thank you.

In Leading & Managing Computing & ICT, Research, Using and Teaching Computing & ICT Tags qualifications, ICT and Computing Qualifications, survey
← Computing discussion topic 2016-05-25: The algorithm that is too effectiveComputing discussion topic 2016-05-23 →
Recent book reviews
Review: Social Media for Academics
Review: Social Media for Academics

This book is very readable, and if I sound surprised that is because it’s not always true of academics!

Read More →
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example

For the time being, this book is free in Kindle format.

Read More →
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too

Despite the relative paucity of immediately obvious National Curriculum links, teachers will find several of sections of this book to be highly engaging.

Read More →
Review: The Dictators: 64 Dictators, 64 Authors, 64 Warnings from History
Review: The Dictators: 64 Dictators, 64 Authors, 64 Warnings from History

In some respects one could view this book as a single warning repeated 64 times.

Read More →
Review: The Bookshop, The Draper, The Candlestick Maker: A History of the High Street 
Review: The Bookshop, The Draper, The Candlestick Maker: A History of the High Street 

Taking readers from the Middle Ages to (more or less) the present day, Gray charts how the places where we do our shopping and what we buy have changed over the centuries.

Read More →
Review: Extraordinary Learning For All
Review: Extraordinary Learning For All

As a source of potential ideas and inspiration, the book could be very useful indeed.

Read More →
Review: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them
Review: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them

One has the impression that the main role of the university these days is to maximise profit, while that of the majority of teaching staff is to ensure the ‘correct’ views are passed on to students. All the while, students’ main concern seems to be to seek protection from anything that might make them feel unsafe.

Read More →
Review: Next Practices - An Executive Guide for Education Decision Makers
Review: Next Practices - An Executive Guide for Education Decision Makers

Is a 2014 book on managing the computing provision in a school still worth buying?

Read More →
Still relevant (sadly): How to lie with statistics, by Darrell Huff
Still relevant (sadly): How to lie with statistics, by Darrell Huff

Although this book is over 60 years old, it is remarkably apposite for our times -- and especially in the fields of educational research and assessing pupils' understanding and progress.

Read More →
Quick looks: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them
Quick looks: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them

It was a great source of pride to me, getting hundreds of students through their A levels and encouraging them to go to university. But for some time I have asked myself a question: would I recommend this route now?

Read More →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved