• Front Page
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
A word cloud of the GCSE options that schools are offering in Computing and related subjects

A word cloud of the GCSE options that schools are offering in Computing and related subjects

Computing options at GCSE: interim survey results

May 24, 2016

A couple of weeks ago I launched a survey to find out what GCSE options schools were offering to their students. In return for completing the survey, you receive an up-to-date list of officially approved qualifications in Computer Science and other digital technology subjects. If you would like to take part in the survey and by so doing acquire this marvellous freebie, here is the link:

ICT and Computing Qualifications Survey

Actually, that's the link even if you don't wish to take part in the survey, but you know what I mean.

Anyway, here are some initial results. Bear in mind that I haven't had the chance to send out this "call to action" in my own newsletter, Digital Education, yet, so these results may change once I've done that.

The big picture

First thing to do is look at the word cloud above. I thought that would be the easiest way of conveying the gist of what schools are doing. As you can, Computer Science is the main offering, with the European Computer Driving Licence (ECDL) a close second (perhaps unsurprisingly given that one organisation has claimed to be able to get students through it in three days -- see this news article).

The ECDL is a skills-based course. Cambridge Nationals is a vocational, business-oriented alternative to the (soon-to-be-scrapped) ICT qualification, and that, too, is extremely popular. As you can see, it is more or less neck and neck with the ECDL.

I think it's encouraging that some schools   are offering skills and vocational alternatives (or additions) to the more academic Computer Science. (Don't forget: in theory you can offer any approved subject from the third "bucket" of Progress 8. That means that you could offer Computer Science from the second "bucket", which would count towards the eBacc, and a more vocational option in the third "bucket". I say "in theory" because in practice much will depend on the senior leadership team -- and the head of department's ability and willingness to "sell" the other options.)

Cambridge iMedia is popular too, as you can see from the word cloud, though apparently less so than the others I've already mentioned.

Some statistics

To put some numbers to these findings, 85% of respondents are going to be offering Computer Science GCSE, while 72% will be offering a computing-related option from the third "bucket". The reason that these figures add up to more than 100% is, of course, that schools can offer more than one computing option.

The reasons given for offering Computer Science includes "academic rigour" and the EBacc. Reasons for offering alternatives include "engages girls and boys across ability ranges" and "suitable to the needs of the target audience".

The long-term view

As an eternal optimist I see the demise of ICT as an opportunity. Like the discarding of Levels in the context of assessment, it should act as a catalyst to rethink one's approach. Looking at the list of approved qualifications, there are some interesting and exciting-looking alternatives.

Some schools have reformed their Key Stage 3 curriculum in the light of the requirements of Key Stage 4. There is a danger that doing this at too early a stage could perhaps serve to narrow an individual's choices, so flexibility should be built into the system. On the other hand, taking, in effect, five years to cover a GCSE subject should yield very good results. Certainly that proved to be the case when I adopted such a strategy, ie introducing GCSE-type work and questions into Year 7 and beyond.

I will be publishing the results of the survey soon after the forthcoming half-term I hope. If you wish to take part in it, and acquire the list of approved qualifications by so doing, then once again the link is: ICT and Computing Qualifications Survey.

There has already been a sizeable response to the survey, but obviously the more responses the better, so please do take part if you have not done so already. I've designed the survey in such a way as to not take up too much of your time.

Thank you.

In Leading & Managing Computing & ICT, Research, Using and Teaching Computing & ICT Tags qualifications, ICT and Computing Qualifications, survey
← Computing discussion topic 2016-05-25: The algorithm that is too effectiveComputing discussion topic 2016-05-23 →
Recent book reviews
When.jpg
Review: When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing

Hopefully, neither you nor I will ever find ourselves in court, undergoing a medical procedure, or taking an important exam.

Read more →
finding fibonacci.jpg
Review: Finding Fibonacci: The Quest to Rediscover the Forgotten Mathematical Genius Who Changed the World

Finding Fibonacci is a memoir of the authors’ quest to find out about Fibonacci.

Read more →
The Teachers' Standards in Primary Schools.jpg
Quick look: The Teachers' Standards in Primary Schools

This is very well set out. It takes each standard, and gives you ideas on how to achieve it, and what success in this context looks like.

Read more →
How Computer Games Help Children learn.jpg
Quick look: How Computer Games Help Children learn

When I was teaching Econnures I realised that I could have taught quite a chunk of the synabus if I'd been able to run Sim City on the school network.

Read more →
Reinventing Project-Based learning.jpg
Quick look: Reinventing Project-Based Learning

I can verify from first hand experience that PBL kept students highly engaged, and helped them to develop skills such as working with others and independent research.

Read more →
The human touch.jpg
Quick look: The Human Touch

Although this book is published by the BCS, the Chartered Institute for IT, the focus is not on IT at all.

Read more →
Better Living through science.jpg
Quick look: Better Living through science

I have often thought that I would have been much more interested in science at school, and been much more successful at it, had the teachers taught us anything of practical value.

Read more →
Tubes.jpg
Quick look: Tubes: Behind the scenes at the internet

We are all so accustomed to using the internet, searching the world wide web — "going online" — that most of us most of the time probably do not stop to consider the question: yes, but where exactly is it?

Read more →
profits, prophets.jpg
Quick look: Profits, Prophets, Coaches and Kings: (When) do leaders make a difference?

I have somewhat dichotomous views of this question of whether leaders make a difference, or much of a difference.

Read more →
power up.jpg
Review: Power Up, by Matthew Lane

This book looks at the maths concepts — and, to some extent, the physics concepts — hidden in popular video games.

Read more →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved