­
The relaunch of the Digital Education newsletter — ICT & Computing in Education
  • Front Page
  • Search
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Search
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Me slaving over the next issue of Digital Education

Me slaving over the next issue of Digital Education

The relaunch of the Digital Education newsletter

March 26, 2018

Bravery comes in many forms. My moment came a week or so ago when I decided it was time to move everyone who had subscribed to Digital Education to a new version of the newsletter. The reason was simple: under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), newsletter publishers have to prove that the people on their list really do want to hear from them.

In my case, I've been using a double opt-in approach ever since I started the newsletter in the year 2000. By 'double opt-in' is meant the situation where you have to confirm your subscription after you've signed up. All my subscribers had gone through such a process, so they had all originally confirmed.

You might think it a bit odd that I would wish to start messing about with the list, but the key word in the previous paragraph is 'originally'. People change jobs, move on, or lose interest. In many cases, rather than unsubscribe, they just don't bother to open the emails. 

Also, in many cases I wouldn't have been able to prove that they had confirmed their desire to subscribe, because I moved over to a different company and just clicked on 'Import'. This time, I chose the equivalent of 'Import, subject to confirmation'.

So where does the bravery bit come in? Well, chances are that a lot of people won't confirm. I read of one newsletter writer who had to delete 20,000 names from his list. I feel his pain. Fortunately (touch wood, fingers crossed etc), so far the number of people who have resubscribed (in effect) is very healthy. I don't like discussing actual numbers because I think that's a little crass, too close to bragging if the numbers are high, and somewhat embarrassing if they are low. Besides, the number of subscribers is not the only criterion of success.

Also, people still have until (I believe) the 15th April to confirm. After that, their details disappear automatically. (And if something goes wrong and that doesn't happen, I'll delete them manually).

If you are one of the not-yet-confirmed, or indeed a never-have-subscribed, allow me a few moments to try to convince you.

There are several features of the newsletter, such as news about professional development opportunities, book reviews, suggestions about how to use key issues in the classroom, and hints and tips, and prize draws. You can read more about the features on the newsletter page.

However, I think it important to talk about the benefits, which I see as the following:

  • I've been involved in education for a long time (I started teaching in 1975), so I like to think I know about it. I think, as I am sure some of my contemporaries will agree, that the benefit of such longevity is a knowledge of history in educational terms. Put simply, when someone comes up with a new great idea, there is a pretty good chance that I can evaluate it from the point of view of remembering what was learnt from a similar initiative x years ago.

    This is not about nostalgia, which I think is a waste of time and energy -- see my article Looking back in wonder (that we achieved anything at all). One or two of the links are dead, but the article itself has stood the test of time I think. 

    No, it's about the fact that in education we seem to have no institutional memory. A few months ago I was speaking to an adviser at the Department for Education. I asked him if he knew of the work of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. He said he had vaguely heard of it. Good grief! It was only demolished in 2012. Sooner or later, someone is going to come up with a brilliant curriculum-related idea, not realising they could draw on a wealth of experience from what has gone before.
  • Another benefit of the newsletter is that I'm not usually that interested in being first with the news. I'd rather be last with the news, and then write something worth reading. I like to cogitate.
  • A third benefit is that I am very much in favour of educational research in all its forms, so I report on research whose findings look like being useful to teachers of Computing and related subjects.
  • That brings me on to a fourth benefit. It's very niche: if it doesn't have anything to do with education technology in some way, I don't include it.
  • Fifthly, I do a lot of reading, which saves subscribers a lot of time.
  • Sixthly, I do my best to keep my political opinions to myself. I don't like being lectured to on Facebook or Twitter or in other newsletters, so I don't do that to other people.
  • Finally, I try to ensure that the newsletter reads nicely. I know that may not sound like much of a benefit, but just because something concerns technology doesn't mean it has to read like a computer program!

If you'd like to subscribe, fill in the form on the newsletters page.

In Digital Education, News & views Tags Digital Education
← 5 ways to develop critical thinking in ICT and ComputingNew prize draw for two thought-provoking books →
Recent book reviews
Review: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them
Review: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them

One has the impression that the main role of the university these days is to maximise profit, while that of the majority of teaching staff is to ensure the ‘correct’ views are passed on to students. All the while, students’ main concern seems to be to seek protection from anything that might make them feel unsafe.

Read More →
Review: Next Practices - An Executive Guide for Education Decision Makers
Review: Next Practices - An Executive Guide for Education Decision Makers

Is a 2014 book on managing the computing provision in a school still worth buying?

Read More →
Still relevant (sadly): How to lie with statistics, by Darrell Huff
Still relevant (sadly): How to lie with statistics, by Darrell Huff

Although this book is over 60 years old, it is remarkably apposite for our times -- and especially in the fields of educational research and assessing pupils' understanding and progress.

Read More →
Quick looks: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them
Quick looks: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them

It was a great source of pride to me, getting hundreds of students through their A levels and encouraging them to go to university. But for some time I have asked myself a question: would I recommend this route now?

Read More →
Review: The Bright Side: Why Optimists Have the Power to Change the World
Review: The Bright Side: Why Optimists Have the Power to Change the World

At first glance, you might take this to be one of those books full of affirmations and anecdotes designed to lift your mood.

Read More →
Review: Small Habits Create Big Change: Strategies to Avoid Burnout and Thrive in Your Education Career
Review: Small Habits Create Big Change: Strategies to Avoid Burnout and Thrive in Your Education Career

My review of this for Teach Secondary magazine has just come out. Here is the published version, followed by the copy I submitted, which is slightly longer because it has a little more detail.

Read More →
Review: Productive Failure: Unlocking Deeper Learning Through the Science of Failing
Review: Productive Failure: Unlocking Deeper Learning Through the Science of Failing

My review of this for Teach Secondary magazine has just come out. Here is the published version, followed by the copy I submitted, which is slightly longer because it is a little more detailed.

Read More →
Review: AI Snake Oil: AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference
Review: AI Snake Oil: AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference

My review of this for Teach Secondary magazine has just come out. Here is the published version, followed by the copy I submitted, which is slightly longer because it has a little more detail.

Read More →
When AI can write as well as this, I'll worry! Plus a prize competition.
When AI can write as well as this, I'll worry! Plus a prize competition.

To paraphrase what Arthur C Clarke said about teachers, any writer that can be replaced by a computer probably should be.

Read More →
Review: The Shortest History of Music -- two reviews in one!
Review: The Shortest History of Music -- two reviews in one!

The music programme of study requires students to possess an understanding of the music they perform and that which they listen to, as well as a grasp of music history, and an appreciation of different musical styles.

Read More →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved