­
Discussing exam grades with students — ICT & Computing in Education
  • Front Page
  • Search
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Search
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Discussing, by Terry Freedman

Discussing, by Terry Freedman

Discussing exam grades with students

February 15, 2021

This morning on Twitter I saw that William Lau had drawn people’s attention to an article in yesterday’s Sunday Times:

Shall we release this at 10pm on a Sunday in a 200 page DFE document? Nah, let’s just leak it to The Times. https://t.co/sefWfbHlcq

— William Lau (@MrLauLearning) February 14, 2021

The article referred to is Back to school on March 8 as Johnson starts lifting lockdown, and the offending paragraph is:

“Exam boards are to ditch plans to force teenagers to sit mini exams to help them decide their GCSE and A-level results, under plans set to be published next week. Instead the tests will be voluntary and teachers will hold one-to-one meetings to students about the grades they should be aspiring to in order to avert last year’s grades fiasco.”
— Sunday Times

There are several aspects of this to discuss.

First, the manner of the announcement. As far as I can tell, the first that teachers will have heard of this is when they read it in the paper, or on Twitter. If anyone in the DfE wishes to know why so many teachers hold them, and in particular the Education Secretary, in such low regard, I suggest they consider the way they go about things. Announcing important updates on Friday evenings or just before a school holiday or in the middle of a school holiday is bad enough, but to announce it to the press first is arguably worse.

Second, there is the tone: teachers will hold one-to-one meetings, not “we would like them to — if they don’t already”.

Third, there is some discussion on Twitter about the time involved. I agree that the DfE always seems to fail to scale up the time required. For example, if you teach, as I did, around 120 students in their exam year, spending 10 minutes with each of them equates to around 20 hours, which is about 4 days in terms of school time.

However, I should think many teachers hold discussions with their students anyway. I know I used to, but I think it’s more difficult now. I found the time by having chats with students privately during lessons while the others were working on a problem in their small groups. One could do that online, of course, in breakout rooms, assuming the students you wish to speak to are present, and that the school is happy to allow that to happen, as opposed to insisting that each lesson is completely “full on” in terms of teacher exposition. I think that it would be reasonable for the school to schedule revision lessons, aka study periods, in which students are given appointments for a discussion with the teacher while the others work on their own.

Fourth, I have a problem with the wording:

“… teachers will hold one-to-one meetings to students about the grades they should be aspiring to…”

This sounds a lot like the enactment of one of Clint Eastwood’s favourite lines: “A man’s got to know his limitations.” In my experience, many students understand all too well their limitations — it was more often their parents I had problems with:

“Well, Mrs Bloggs, it would be unusual for Oxford to give a place on a mathematics course when they have not progressed beyond Year 8 in terms of ability….”

I thought a large part of my role, though, was to encourage students to aspire to higher grades that they had in mind. My reasoning was simple: if you aim for a grade 7, say, hopefully you’ll emerge with at least a grade 6, because you’d have done the revision needed to obtain a grade 7. I know it’s not as simple as that, especially now, but that strikes me as better than what the DfE appears to be advocating.

Also, a lot of the students I taught had low self-esteem already. They didn’t need me to reinforce their opinions of themselves. Students rise or fall to the level of teachers’ expectations, as all teachers know.

These issues are complex. Is there anyone in the Department for Education who understands that education is more than issuing edicts?


Terry Freedman qualified as a teacher in 1975, has written for educational publications since 1989, and has published this website since 1995.

If you found this article interesting and useful, why not subscribe to my free newsletter, Digital Education? It’s been going since the year 2000, and has slow news, informed views and honest reviews for Computing and ed tech teachers — and useful experience-based tips.

In Leading & Managing Computing & ICT, News & views Tags exam, DfE, assessment
← Broadband in schools -- circa 2003Conference: The future of education technology UPDATED →
Recent book reviews
Backlist: The Written World
Backlist: The Written World

Writing was invented ‘only’ a few thousand years ago. It’s a fascinating story.

Read More →
Backlist: What I'm reading: Bounce
Backlist: What I'm reading: Bounce

What does it take to become an expert? And what can the Computing teacher do about it?

Read More →
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution

The title of this book invites curiosity: what were the other three ‘revolutions?

Read More →
A book review for your English department colleagues perhaps
A book review for your English department colleagues perhaps

Some of these stories are so richly told, it can almost seem as though you’re right there with him.

Read More →
Review: Pen Names
Review: Pen Names

OK, so this has nothing to do with education technology, but we all read (I hope!). A very interesting examination of the pen names some authors have adopted, and why.

Read More →
Review: The Library of Ancient Wisdom: Mesopotamia and the Making of History
Review: The Library of Ancient Wisdom: Mesopotamia and the Making of History

There's a really interesting section in this book about how ceramic storage of data and information is probably the most likely medium to stand the test of time.

Read More →
A book review for your biology colleagues perhaps
A book review for your biology colleagues perhaps

The subject under discussion here is how human physiology has developed in different ways, in response to different conditions around the world.

Read More →
Review: Social Media for Academics
Review: Social Media for Academics

This book is very readable, and if I sound surprised that is because it’s not always true of academics!

Read More →
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example

For the time being, this book is free in Kindle format.

Read More →
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too

Despite the relative paucity of immediately obvious National Curriculum links, teachers will find several of sections of this book to be highly engaging.

Read More →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved