­
Collating resources for my Assessment in Computing course — ICT & Computing in Education
  • Front Page
  • Search
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Search
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
But does she understand what she's doing? Photo by Gerd Altmann.

But does she understand what she's doing? Photo by Gerd Altmann.

Collating resources for my Assessment in Computing course

March 3, 2017

In a few weeks' time I'll be running another one of my Assessment in Computing courses, and I have some workshops coming up as well (more details soon).  As part of the course I include a hefty booklet containing, amongst other things, a comprehensive list of questions by which to evaluate your own practice, and a list of resources. It's the latter that I wish to talk about.

You'd think that finding and collating lists of assessment-related resources would be fairly straightforward, but in my experience there are a number of challenges.

First, when it comes to assessment in general, there are hundreds, maybe even thousands, of books, articles, and videos on the subject. So the first challenge is to try and identify ones that seem most likely to be useful and relevant.

Secondly, I don't like to recommend something just because it has a nice title, or even because it's been written by an expert. The corollary of that statement is that I have evaluated everything I do recommend. It's a labour-intensive process to say the least!

Thirdly, when it comes to assessing Computing in particular, there are relatively few resources. And many of these are not useful at all. For example, when it comes to measuring progress, I've seen assessment tasks that ask the student to make the program say "Hello, world" and then, as a so-called harder task, to make the program say "Hello, world", followed by "What a lovely day it is today!"

Unless that second sentence is based on an input like a temperature reading or something, it's no harder to code than the first one. It's just another sentence.

I've also noticed that many people (most people?) cite Bloom's Taxonomy, while inadvertently making it clear that they've never actually read Bloom's Taxonomy. (I have, but had to use the British Library to do so.)

Those are just two of the examples of disappointing 'expertise' I've come across. 

So sorting the wheat from the chaff is a bit of a task.

I would also suggest that relying on crowd-sourcing, as the Project Quantum does to some extent, is no solution. Or at least, not a complete solution. Why not? Because not all of the questions and quizzes that have been uploaded will be good.

However, in my list of resources I do include Project Quantum and other teacher-created resources because even if you don't find one you regard as excellent, you may find one that is good enough, or that you can tweak (if the licence allows that) or that will spark some ideas of your own.

Another reason I include such resources is that while something created by a teacher may not satisfy the assessment 'expert' as far as technicalities such as validity and reliability are concerned, more often than not it will be very useful by dint of the fact that it actually works.

For instance, take a quiz created for use with Socrative. It's not likely to win any prizes for assessment design, but if it gives you a 'quick and dirty' idea of whether your class understands what a conditional is, who cares?

Because of the sheer number of resources 'out there', I can't possibly scrutinise them all. So what I do when I come across one that looks promising, but which I don't have time to examine in detail, is list them with an asterisk next to them. That means, in effect, "This doesn't look bad at all, but I haven't gone into it enough to be able to recommend it as such -- but do take a look."

A challenge of a completely different nature is when resources originally released as a freemium model, by which you could access a certain amount free of charge and then have access to even more when you subscribe, no longer offer the free bit. That has happened with several of the resources I listed when I first ran the course in 2013. In those cases, I've deleted them from my list -- not because they're not free, but because I can no longer test them to make sure they're OK. (In many cases you can't ask for a free trial unless you can prove you're a school.)

A similar issue is when a resource I looked at and recommended a year ago has now become subsumed into another resource, or another company, or has completely changed its nature even though the name and website remain unchanged.

(To give you an idea of why it's so important to revisit previously-recommended resources, 20 years ago a geography website badged by the government as good for schools to use was taken over by a company peddling pornography. But its url had remained exactly the same.)

Finally, a challenging situation is one where something is called something which it isn't. A case in point was the introduction of Assessing Pupils' Progress in England and Wales a few years ago. Billed as 'Assessment for Learning', it had about as much in common with AfL as Vlad the Impaler had with defenders of human rights.

Despite these challenges, my list has grown from 62 to 88 -- and possibly 89 as I have just heard about another assessment app that I need to explore.

And no doubt the number will have changed again by the time I actually run the course!


If you're interested in coming on one of my assessment courses, (or hiring me to run a workshop or give a talk on the subject), but aren't sure, check out what people have said about them on the Course Testimonials page. If you are sure, then please get in touch.

In Assessment, Professional development, Using and Teaching Computing & ICT Tags assessing Computing, assessment, assessment for learning
← What I've been reading: Thinking Critically with Digital MediaWhat I'm reading: books on digital literacy and Raspberry Pi →
Recent book reviews
Backlist: The Written World
Backlist: The Written World

Writing was invented ‘only’ a few thousand years ago. It’s a fascinating story.

Read More →
Backlist: What I'm reading: Bounce
Backlist: What I'm reading: Bounce

What does it take to become an expert? And what can the Computing teacher do about it?

Read More →
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution
Backlist: The Fourth Education Revolution

The title of this book invites curiosity: what were the other three ‘revolutions?

Read More →
A book review for your English department colleagues perhaps
A book review for your English department colleagues perhaps

Some of these stories are so richly told, it can almost seem as though you’re right there with him.

Read More →
Review: Pen Names
Review: Pen Names

OK, so this has nothing to do with education technology, but we all read (I hope!). A very interesting examination of the pen names some authors have adopted, and why.

Read More →
Review: The Library of Ancient Wisdom: Mesopotamia and the Making of History
Review: The Library of Ancient Wisdom: Mesopotamia and the Making of History

There's a really interesting section in this book about how ceramic storage of data and information is probably the most likely medium to stand the test of time.

Read More →
A book review for your biology colleagues perhaps
A book review for your biology colleagues perhaps

The subject under discussion here is how human physiology has developed in different ways, in response to different conditions around the world.

Read More →
Review: Social Media for Academics
Review: Social Media for Academics

This book is very readable, and if I sound surprised that is because it’s not always true of academics!

Read More →
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example

For the time being, this book is free in Kindle format.

Read More →
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too

Despite the relative paucity of immediately obvious National Curriculum links, teachers will find several of sections of this book to be highly engaging.

Read More →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved