• Front Page
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
A Minor Harp, by Terry Freedman

A Minor Harp, by Terry Freedman

Leaders are like harp players

May 10, 2020

The “harp” referred to in the title of this post is a blues harp, a type of harmonica. Someone told me a few months ago that the definition of a gentleman is someone who has a harmonica — and doesn’t play it.

I knew what she meant. Used in the right way, in the right place and sparingly, a blues harp has the capacity to really lift a jazz or blues number — though I’m not sure “lift” is quite the right word. But too much, or too loud, and it can drive you insane.

I was reminded of this recently, and thereby reminded of a crucial role for leaders to play during the current pandemic. I was looking on YouTube for examples of people playing blues using a chromatic harmonica (the ones with a slide to enable you to change key). I came across some people who were brilliantly proficient in a technical sense, but absolutely awful musicians. Why? Because they didn’t stop playing. At every point where there could have been — should have been — a break, they were in there, filling the airwaves with notes. Too many notes soon become noise, and you stop listening.

The best leaders I’ve come across do not constantly interfere. They are not there “playing notes”, trying to show you how brilliant they are. Their “crucial role”, as I put it earlier, is to stay silent. I am especially impressed by those who have not specified how classes should take place online, only that they should do so where possible.

I am doing a course at one college where the tutor can decide (in collaboration with their students in some cases) what technology to use. Thus some have opted for Zoom, some Skype, others Google Meet, and so on. The Principal or Heads of Department haven’t been stipulating what technology is to be used, or how the lessons are going to be conducted. They haven’t been tempted to micromanage, to concern themselves with the minutiae.

Now, I may be giving them too much benefit of the doubt. Perhaps they are not interfering because they don’t know enough about the technology to do so. Perhaps next year the tutors will all start receiving instructions about what to use and how to use it in order to satisfy some inspection regime or other. I hope not.

If you found this article interesting and useful, why not subscribe to my newsletter, Digital Education? It’s been going since the year 2000, and has news, views and reviews for Computing and ed tech teachers.


In Leading & Managing Computing & ICT, M-learning Tags harp, blues harp, leaders, Covid19, Covid-19
← Covid-19: Is an online school the answer?Book review: Teachers vs Tech? →
Recent book reviews
a little history of the earth.jpg
One for your Geography colleagues perhaps? Review: A Little History of the Earth -- two reviews in one!
Read more →
a word for all seasons.jpg
For your English colleagues: A Word for all Seasons -- two reviews in one!
Read more →
the mending.jpg
For your maths colleagues: The Mending of Broken Bones: A Modern Guide to Classical Algebra -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
the worst exhibition.jpg
For your History colleagues: The Worst Exhibition in the World: Degenerate Art, 1937 -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
History lesson, by Terry Freedman.jpg
Is The computing Curriculum Too Masculine? Revisited 16 years later!

One of the apparently insoluble problems of the age is how do you encourage more girls to take up Computing? I think a lot can be done, and have done so myself, but I wonder how far a lot of the effort fails to get to the heart of the issue, which could be the curriculum itself, the way it is taught, or a combination of the two?

Read more →
best writing maths.jpg
Book review: The best writing on mathematics, 2016

I think this could be an excellent resource for teachers of mathematics.

Read more →
international short (2).jpg
For your Eng Lit colleagues? The Penguin Book of the International Short Story -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote!

Read more →
Turner and Constable (1).jpg
Two reviews in one: Turner and Constable: Rivals and Originals -- art and history

One for your colleagues, perhaps: art, art history, ploitics with a small ‘p’.

Read more →
satire (1).jpg
Two reviews in one: State of Ridicule: A History of Satire in English Literature -- politics, history, English

One for your colleagues, perhaps. Sperrin has provided a wealth of information that can be used to provide a rich experience for students of politics, history and English literature.

Read more →
a little history of maths.jpg
Two reviews in one: A Little History of Mathematics

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved