• Front Page
  • Search
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Search
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Photo by Mimi Thian on Unsplash

Photo by Mimi Thian on Unsplash

How to run a consultation

March 24, 2019

If you want to run a consultation but are concerned that the outcome might not be to your liking, you need to word the questionnaire very carefully. Or rather, you need to ensure that there is as little opportunity as possible for respondents to voice their disagreement with the proposal in question.

This should be obvious from the fact that in at least two recent consultations undertaken by the government in England, a spokesperson has announced that the thing under discussion will be implemented once the consultation process is over. That sort of suggests that the thing is going to go ahead come what may.

There’s a consultation going on near where I live about a proposal to build a new school and a housing complex. There is one question that gives you the space to disagree — an open-ended “Any other comments?” one at the end. All the others are in the nature of “Which of the following benefits of this idea do you think is the most important?”. I mention this because it’s not just government consultations that have such shortcomings.

I always take part in consultations because I think that if you don’t then (a) you can’t really complain if things turn out the way you wish they hadn’t, and (b) it will only be a question of time before some bean counter in the Treasury concludes that given the low response rate to consultations, the costs outweigh the benefits.

But what I do is answer the questions that I think should have been asked, and let rip in the “Any other comments?” section.

For example, in answer to the “Which of these benefits is #1?” question I mentioned earlier, I added another option: None of the above. I don’t suppose it will be recorded, because there won’t be a slot for that kind of response in their database, but I thought it important to state anyway.

In any case, I state my full case in the Comments question, going on to a new sheet if necessary.

I also photograph my completed questionnaire if it’s on paper, or save, copy/paste or screenshot it if it’s online.

There is a third option sometimes, which is to follow up in an email. I think it’s important to do that too if possible.

Unfortunately, although the organisations that consult using leading questions may gain a short-term and private advantage, I believe the long-term and social cost is an increase of cynicism and distrust. It’s a very short-sighted strategy.

In News & views Tags consultation, leading questions
← Creating multiple signatures in GmailProblems in the ed tech classroom #1 →
Recent book reviews
curiosity.jpg
Review: Cabinet of Curiosity - Developing a Superpower

School life ought to consist of far more than just a utilitarian pursuit of exam grades over all other considerations.

Read More →
dr bot.jpg
Review: Dr Bot - Why Doctors Can Fail Us-and How Al Could Save Lives

In this comprehensive and highly readable Dr Bot, Blease tackles a wide range of issues, including some that are apposite for those working in schools.

Read More →
books a manifesto.jpg
Review: Books A Manifesto - Or, How to Build a Library

A compelling read that's bound to make even the most well-read among us feel somewhat under-educated.

Read More →
algospeak.jpg
Review: Algospeak-How Social Media is Transforming the Future of Language

A fascinating insight into how language evolves and adjusts according to changes in culture.

Read More →
polish.jpg
Need a break? This book of short stories could be just the ticket!

The 39 stories in this collection span a hundred years, during which Polish society underwent seismic political change several times over.

Read More →
digital culture shock.jpg
Review: Digital Culture Shock: Who Creates Technology and Why This Matters

An interesting look at how differently societies across the globe view and use technlogogy.

Read More →
the idea machine.jpg
Review: The Idea Machine: How Books Built Our World and Shape Our Future

The written word has endured for millennia, and herein you'll discover why.

Read More →
craftland.jpg
Review: Craftland: A Journey Through Britain's Lost Arts and Vanishing Trades

A book that offers a glimpse into the way traditional crafts were practised before the Industrial Revolution.

Read More →
digital culture shock.jpg
Quick look: Digital Culture Shock: Who Creates Technology and Why This Matters

Chapters look at how technology is used around the world, online communities, and building a culturally just infrastucture, amongst other topics.

Read More →
Artificially Gifted Notes from a Post-Genius World.jpg
Quick look: Artificially Gifted: Notes from a Post-Genius World

The author, Mechelle Gilford, explores how AI may render our usual way of interpreting the concept of “gifted” obsolete.

Read More →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved