­
16 pet hates about presentations and presenters — ICT & Computing in Education
  • Front Page
  • Search
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Search
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Angry, by Terry Freedman

Angry, by Terry Freedman

16 pet hates about presentations and presenters

August 20, 2019

As teachers will be going back to school soon (and some already have), they face the likelihood of the dreaded training day (often a misnomer if ever there was one). And with that comes the near-certainty of being “treated” to a talk by some expert or other. Just the thought of the kind of presentations I have had to sit through brings me out in a cold sweat, so rather than keep all this rage to myself I thought I’d share it!

Faffing with the technology

I have little patience with presenters who waste time at the start of their talk by trying to find their presentation, or wondering how to get it show up on the screen. All that stuff should be sorted out beforehand. Maybe it’s not their fault. Maybe it’s sloppy organisation. Whenever I run a conference or training day, I ask for the presentations at least a week in advance if possible.

Waiting a few minutes

Why is it that when it’s time to begin their talk, some speakers start by saying “I think we’ll give people just a few more minutes.” Why? We all managed to arrive on time, cutting short cups of tea or conversations, or getting puffed out running for the bus. Surely the most important audience members are the people who are actually there? I always endeavour to start on time, and the only time I’ve relaxed that rule is when there’s a problem on public transport or the roads, and people are coming in at 20 second intervals. That’s so disruptive that it’s probably better to wait a few minutes rather than plough on against all the interruptions. But that’s very much the exception to the rule.

Starting with “Hey -- name of place” and then asking how we are

This is not some sort of pyramid scheme recruitment gathering for goodness’ sake. We don’t need to be gee’d up as if we’re a bunch of children.

Addressing the audience as “You guys”

I always think the subtext of this is “You lot need to listen to this and do what I suggest; it doesn’t apply to me because I’m the guru here.”

Starting with their life story

I have enough confidence in whoever arranged this speaker to believe that they chose someone with the requisite expertise. Besides, it comes across to me as “But enough about me; let’s talk about my theories.” They could refer people to their website or Linkedin profile instead of wasting our time.

Telling the audience what they said to the Government or the President of China

We get it, you’re a big shot. Now please tell us what we came here to learn.

Audience participation in the form of throwing things into the gathering

I’m always afraid it’s going to knock my glasses off, knock my tea over everything or knock my eye out. Please just speak!

Audience participation in the form of a “quick discussion with your neighbour”

I always think this is a deliberate ploy to disguise the fact that the speaker doesn’t have enough material or knowledge to last the allotted time. I hardly ever find these discussions useful, because 2 minutes each is not enough time to explore issues. (The most ridiculous example I saw was a speaker telling the audience to “talk to the person behind you”.)

Presenters who start every sentence with “So”

Another delaying tactic, while the speaker struggles to think of what they are going to say next.

Presenters who read out every word of their slides

The senior manager who was about two levels above me and who had organised a large-scale training day asked me how I thought they could improve on the event next year. “Get speakers who assume we can all read”, I said. For some reason that didn’t go down too well.

Presenters who use slides that bear no obvious relation to what they’re saying

Maybe it’s just me, but I find that by the time I’ve worked out what the illustration has to do with anything, I’ve missed what the speaker has been saying. I think clear exposition should be the order of the day, not some sort of enigma.

Presenters who end their presentation by saying “Let’s start a conversation about this issue”, and then fail to provide any means of doing so

I think that shows they did not make the suggestion seriously. Mostly, the talks of such people may be summed up, usually, as “There’s a problem, and someone needs to do something about it.”

Text that is too small to read  from the back of the room.

The correct size for a poster would be around 2 inches for every 30 feet. But this would translate into a font size of 144 points! I’ve always found that between 28 and 36 points work well for a large room.

Dark text on a dark background

It may look “edgy” but it’s unreadable.

Presenters who mumble

What’s the point of speaking if you don’t make yourself be heard?

Presenters whose voice becomes inaudible at the end of sentences

I find this infuriating. Some radio presenters do this constantly. You hear a great piece of music, and you wait to find out what it was and who was playing, and then you hear “That was Vivaldi’s Violin Concerto in D major, and the soloist was John <inaudible>, Aaaaargh!

Well, that’s it. Thanks for listening, I feel much better now.

Tomorrow: Ideas for ed tech training.

On the subject of training, I’ve just completed a series of articles on my best IT training days, and have almost completed a series about my worst ones. I’ll be collating those articles for subscribers to my newsletter, Digital Education.

My latest ebook

...



In News & views, On the lighter side, Professional development Tags presentations, presenters, training
← Ideas for In-Service Training for ed tech teachersMy Best IT Training Days #6: It's like dating for the first time! →
Recent book reviews
Review: Social Media for Academics
Review: Social Media for Academics

This book is very readable, and if I sound surprised that is because it’s not always true of academics!

Read More →
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example
Quick looks: VIBE Coding by Example

For the time being, this book is free in Kindle format.

Read More →
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too
Review: The Game Changers: How Playing Games Changed the World and Can Change You Too

Despite the relative paucity of immediately obvious National Curriculum links, teachers will find several of sections of this book to be highly engaging.

Read More →
Review: The Dictators: 64 Dictators, 64 Authors, 64 Warnings from History
Review: The Dictators: 64 Dictators, 64 Authors, 64 Warnings from History

In some respects one could view this book as a single warning repeated 64 times.

Read More →
Review: The Bookshop, The Draper, The Candlestick Maker: A History of the High Street&nbsp;
Review: The Bookshop, The Draper, The Candlestick Maker: A History of the High Street 

Taking readers from the Middle Ages to (more or less) the present day, Gray charts how the places where we do our shopping and what we buy have changed over the centuries.

Read More →
Review: Extraordinary Learning For All
Review: Extraordinary Learning For All

As a source of potential ideas and inspiration, the book could be very useful indeed.

Read More →
Review: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them
Review: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them

One has the impression that the main role of the university these days is to maximise profit, while that of the majority of teaching staff is to ensure the ‘correct’ views are passed on to students. All the while, students’ main concern seems to be to seek protection from anything that might make them feel unsafe.

Read More →
Review: Next Practices - An Executive Guide for Education Decision Makers
Review: Next Practices - An Executive Guide for Education Decision Makers

Is a 2014 book on managing the computing provision in a school still worth buying?

Read More →
Still relevant (sadly): How to lie with statistics, by Darrell Huff
Still relevant (sadly): How to lie with statistics, by Darrell Huff

Although this book is over 60 years old, it is remarkably apposite for our times -- and especially in the fields of educational research and assessing pupils' understanding and progress.

Read More →
Quick looks: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them
Quick looks: Bad Education: Why Our Universities Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them

It was a great source of pride to me, getting hundreds of students through their A levels and encouraging them to go to university. But for some time I have asked myself a question: would I recommend this route now?

Read More →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved