• Front Page
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Menu

ICT & Computing in Education

Articles on education technology and related topics
  • Front Page
  • Newsletters
    • Digital Education
    • Terry Freedman's Books Bulletin
  • RSS
  • Search
  • Info
    • Welcome
    • The "About" Page
    • Testimonials
    • CV/Resumé
    • My Writing
    • Published articles
  • Corrections Policy
Hoses of Parliament at night, by Terry Freedman.jpg

Hoses of Parliament at night, by Terry Freedman.jpg

If leaders of Computing in schools were politicians…

December 27, 2019

This is an updated version of a article I published in 2011.

I was watching a debate in the House of Lords the other day, and I was very struck (I hesitate to use the word 'impressed') by how easily a particular government representative managed to fend off a whole variety of questions without saying anything of any value whatsoever.

After a few of these answers, I was able to boil them down to a formula which could be used in virtually any context.

In essence, his answers consisted of the following parts, in the following order:

1. Agree that X is an issue that should concern all of us. This is a clever tactic because by agreeing with your interlocutors right away, you disarm them.

2. State that only last week you did something or met someone in connection with X. This shows that this is an issue that is uppermost in your mind.

3. State how long you've been addressing X. This indicates that you've been aware of the issue for quite a while. This and the answer to the previous question indicate that you're completely on the ball as far as X is concerned.

4. State that you have been working with other agencies to resolve the problem. This serves to tell or remind the person asking the question that this is not a simple issue, and that what other parties do will affect the success or otherwise of your own actions. If it proves necessary, this will also have prepared the ground for blaming someone else should the matter not be resolved.

5. Express confidence that the right approach is being taken. This is a good way of ending the answer because the unspoken message is: "If you disagree, why don't you suggest something instead of criticising from the sidelines?"

OK, let's see how this might sound in practice:

Headteacher: I've been looking at the examination results, and it seems that girls are not doing as well in Computing as boys. How are you addressing that?

Computing lead: I agree that this is an issue that needs to be resolved. Only last week I was discussing gender bias with a colleague from the University of London. Since taking on this role I've been keeping records of how girls are doing in relation to boys, and looking at a variety of ways in which the issue could be addressed. I've also been discussing it with my colleagues at the local Computing in Schools hub. I feel confident that my approach is on the right lines.

Not bad, I think you'll agree. However, just in case you don't know me, I should just say that this has been written tongue-in-cheek!

In From the Archives, On the lighter side Tags political answer, politicians, politics
← Audio-Visual NewsArticles about AI in the media →
Recent book reviews
a little history of the earth.jpg
One for your Geography colleagues perhaps? Review: A Little History of the Earth -- two reviews in one!
Read more →
a word for all seasons.jpg
For your English colleagues: A Word for all Seasons -- two reviews in one!
Read more →
the mending.jpg
For your maths colleagues: The Mending of Broken Bones: A Modern Guide to Classical Algebra -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
the worst exhibition.jpg
For your History colleagues: The Worst Exhibition in the World: Degenerate Art, 1937 -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
History lesson, by Terry Freedman.jpg
Is The computing Curriculum Too Masculine? Revisited 16 years later!

One of the apparently insoluble problems of the age is how do you encourage more girls to take up Computing? I think a lot can be done, and have done so myself, but I wonder how far a lot of the effort fails to get to the heart of the issue, which could be the curriculum itself, the way it is taught, or a combination of the two?

Read more →
best writing maths.jpg
Book review: The best writing on mathematics, 2016

I think this could be an excellent resource for teachers of mathematics.

Read more →
international short (2).jpg
For your Eng Lit colleagues? The Penguin Book of the International Short Story -- two reviews in one!

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote!

Read more →
Turner and Constable (1).jpg
Two reviews in one: Turner and Constable: Rivals and Originals -- art and history

One for your colleagues, perhaps: art, art history, ploitics with a small ‘p’.

Read more →
satire (1).jpg
Two reviews in one: State of Ridicule: A History of Satire in English Literature -- politics, history, English

One for your colleagues, perhaps. Sperrin has provided a wealth of information that can be used to provide a rich experience for students of politics, history and English literature.

Read more →
a little history of maths.jpg
Two reviews in one: A Little History of Mathematics

I submitted my review of this book to Teach Secondary magazine, an educational magazine in the UK. The first review below is what the magazine published. The second one is what I actually wrote! In substantive terms there is little difference between the two, but you may find it interesting to see what the editor altered.

Read more →
Dig+Ed+Banner.jpg

Contact us

Privacy

Cookies

Terms and conditions

This website is powered by Squarespace

(c) Terry Freedman All Rights Reserved