Search this site
Free subscriptions
Be notified by email if you prefer:


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
Last 100 articles

The Amazing Computer Education Project Book

Remember this?

Amazing Web 2.0 Projects

It’s been downloaded over 35,000 times. I’m hoping to create a similar Computer Education Projects book, which will also be free. Find out how you can help by reading this article:

The Amazing Computer Education Projects Book


Digital Education

News, views and reviews. In-depth articles. Guest contributors. Competitions. Discount codes.

(Not necessarily all in the same issue, but each issue is full of good stuff nonetheless!)

Sign up for our free newsletter now!


Oh No!!If you can't find what you're looking for...

Assuming you’ve tried variations of your search term and checked the spelling without any luck, you may find the article Finding stuff on the ICT in Education website helpful.

Alternatively, if it’s not an article you’re looking for, try looking through the menus at the top of the screen.

E-Books for Sale

Want to make your ICT lessons more interesting?

Then Go on, bore ‘em: How to make your ICT lessons excruciatingly dull is just right for you.

Clustr Map
Terry Freedman's Social Profile
Powered by Squarespace

« You must be joking, right? | Main | Recommended reading »
Wednesday
Oct172012

Further thoughts on the flipped classroom

Around a year ago I wrote an article entitled 8 Observations on flipping the classroom, in which I put forward the reasons I thought it not a great idea. I still stand by those arguments, although my attitude towards flipping the classroom as a general idea has mellowed somewhat. Let me explain.

Class discussion Photo by Andrew Feinberg http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewfeinberg/

My understanding of flipping the classroom, as originally conceived and still talked about as far as I can see, is that it’s a situation in which the teacher records his or her “lectures” so that their students can watch them out of lesson time, freeing up time in the classroom for discussion, interaction between teacher and student, peer learning etc etc etc. Read the article I just referred to for the reasons I think the whole idea is ridiculous, despite the fact that some clearly very clever people have managed to make it work.

My main arguments against it are that:

  • good teachers don’t lecture for very much of the time, if at all;
  • I don’t know of any teacher who has time to record and polish up videos of their lectures and prepare lessons and do their marking and  have some semblance of a private life;
  • Lectures are known to be the least efficient means of transmitting knowledge.

I could go on.

However, if we broaden the concept of flipping the classroom to encompass more than video lectures, it all makes perfect sense. Basically, the idea is that you give your students something to do between this lesson and the next, so that they will be better able in the next lesson to take an active part in it, through discussion, suggestion-making, assessing their peers’ work, and so on. Put like that, it’s pretty amazing isn’t it? I mean, it must make perfect sense, because that’s exactly what good teachers have been doing for eons.Pardon my sarcasm, which I know is unbecoming a gentleman, but really!

If you forget about video lectures for a moment, what else is possible?

  • Ask students to watch a forthcoming TV documentary;
  • Tell them to listen to a forthcoming radio debate.
  • Make a video of a discussion between you and someone else, and tell them to watch that. (I once made a video of a local businesswoman being interviewed by myself. It worked pretty well.)
  • Tell them to read a newspaper article.
  • Tell them to read a particular blog post.
  • Tell them to listen to a particular podcast episode.

I don’t think any of those suggestions obviates the need for some didactic teaching during the lesson itself. The original concept of the flipped classroom lacks credibility, in my opinion, because of it’s all or nothing approach. Back in the real world, most classroom teachers would, I believe, benefit their students more by implementing a more flexible interpretation of “the flipped classroom”.

Enhanced by Zemanta

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

I am so glad you published this article. It seems to me that the latest buzz word is then taken to be that if you are not doing for example "classroom flipping" then you must be doing something wrong. It always seemed to me that when those advocating this thought they had found the holy grail to student engagement ie do the "teaching" outside the classroom and the research and "fun" stuff in the classroom. As you rightly say, good teaching is a mixture of all the best ways to engage young people in learning and for some they need a didactic approach with time to explore and for others time to explore is enough they need to to reflect and ask questions about their findings. Rant over Thanks for provoking my thoughts :)
October 17, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMike Carter
Cheers, Mike. Good to have the feedback: I sometimes feel as if I must have not understood somehting when everyone seems to be raving about something I think is obvious, nonsense, or obviously nonsense!!

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.