Free subscriptions
Be notified by email if you prefer:


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
Search this site
Last 100 articles

The Amazing Computer Education Project Book

Remember this?

Amazing Web 2.0 Projects

It’s been downloaded over 35,000 times. I’m hoping to create a similar Computer Education Projects book, which will also be free. Find out how you can help by reading this article:

The Amazing Computer Education Projects Book


Digital Education

News, views and reviews. In-depth articles. Guest contributors. Competitions. Discount codes.

(Not necessarily all in the same issue, but each issue is full of good stuff nonetheless!)

Sign up for our free newsletter now!


Oh No!!If you can't find what you're looking for...

Assuming you’ve tried variations of your search term and checked the spelling without any luck, you may find the article Finding stuff on the ICT in Education website helpful.

Alternatively, if it’s not an article you’re looking for, try looking through the menus at the top of the screen.

E-Books for Sale

Want to make your ICT lessons more interesting?

Then Go on, bore ‘em: How to make your ICT lessons excruciatingly dull is just right for you.

Clustr Map
Terry Freedman's Social Profile
Powered by Squarespace

« City Learning Centres: The end? | Main | Why I still love paper »
Wednesday
May182011

25 Ways to make yourself unpopular: #21 Use old technology

Everybody involved in ICT loves gleaming new technology. But in  my opinion the guiding principle in decisions about purchasing or deployment should always be what is appropriate and cost-effective. For example, if a subject leader needs a laptop on which to prepare lesson notes, they really don’t need the most up-to-date laptop available. If a subject area would like a computer available on which students can do occasional research, a similar view applies.

I apply, and always have applied, this philosophy to myself. For example, I would love to buy myself the latest iPad, but none of the benefits convince me that it’s worth upgrading.

On this principle, why should be deemed necessary for schools to have a 3 or 5 year educational technology investment and replacement policy regardless of their individual circumstances? Shouldn’t resources be held in a general pot and bid for as needed?

Suggesting to colleagues that older technology is just fine may not be the best way of winning the popularity stakes. But that doesn’t make the statement less true.

Enhanced by Zemanta

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.