Quick links

Advertisement

Profile

Contact me
Follow me on Twitter
What I do

What are the big issues for Ed Tech Leaers?

Have your say by completing a 5 minute survey.

 

Ebook section now updated!

www.bookbuzzr.com

 We're gradually adding ebooks for sale to this website. Look at this page for details.

Feedback on the Amazing Web 2 Projects Book

Please Take Our Poll

Now available:

E-Books for Sale

Ebooks page

Creating a Technology-Rich School £1.99 + VAT if applicable

Go On, Bore 'Em!: How to make ICT lessons excruciatingly dull £1.99 + VAT if applicable

Subscribe via RSS
Be notified by email if you prefer:


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
By the way...

Check out the latest survey on this site.

You can listen to these articles! Just click the link below, or the link in each article.

If you'd like to subscribe via iTunes and other services, please visit this control panel.

Thanks to Simon Widdowson for info about this service, and to Lucas Renzi for raising the matter in the first place.

Powered by Squarespace
Clustr Map
« The world according to Potter Part (1) Going Metric | Main | Ebooks: No Need For Publishers To Worry? »
Thursday
Feb252010

Managing Change: Engaging The Teachers

I've been giving a lot of thought lately to the management of change, as I am giving a couple of presentations on the subject next week. I've been looking in particular at how whole schools can be moved in a new direction, and have identified several key factors which are essential for success.

One of those factors, or conglomeration of factors to be more accurate, is teacher engagement. If teachers don't want to get involved, the change won't happen. Or it may happen in a way that ticks the boxes, but not much more than that. So how do you engage teachers?

I could write a book on that (and books have been written on it), but what it all comes down to is really quite simple: if the (proposed) change helps the teachers to achieve their aims better, they'll adopt it. As long as they can see that to be the case, of course.

Get smartOne way in which to achieve that is to make sure that the technology is used in a  relevant way, and not merely for its own sake. I saw some great examples of relevant use yesterday, when I visited Scargill Junior School in the London Borough of Havering. Interactive Whiteboards, Visualisers and a variety of handheld devices were being used in numeracy and literacy classes, and we also saw or were told about other inspiring examples in subjects like science and PE.

What especially impressed me (among many things which impressed me), was that much thought had gone into how each device and application might be used in a number of contexts, or act as a stimulus. For example, Nintendo Dogs led to a unit of work in which the children study the use of working dogs throughout history.

This kind of curriculum planning works. I saw it in every school I visited in the London Borough of Newham's multimedia project, involving seven schools, which I helped to set up.

Teachers are, on the whole, pragmatists, and dedicated to their work. Give them compelling reasons to adopt new technology and new approaches, and they will do so.


Thanks to Dave Smith of Havering for setting up the visit, and to Amanda (Headteacher) and Karen (ICT subject leader) for a most inspiring morning. Scargill was a winner at the 2008 Handheld Learning Conference: see this article for details.

For more information about how games and handheld learning devices are being used in education, see the forthcoming special edition of Computers in Classrooms, the free ezine.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (6)

Hmm, Terry, you're absolutely right to say that teacher engagement is necessary when managing change but I'm not sure it is quite that easy! I feel it depends critically upon the reason for the change.

Teachers, in common with many people, tend to be resistant to change unless they feel in control of it or that it is beneficial to them (and their work).

Teacher engagement needs to be managed carefully because the natural resistance to change may lead to anything new simply being absorbed or incorporated into existing practices or models.

There is a risk with ed tech, for example, that the technology is simply used to re-inforce current practice rather than transform that practice.

There is a risk that if we prioritise relevancy too highly then the change may be lost. The relevancy needs to be associated with new ways of working rather than with current ways of working. Otherwise, again, we risk reinforcing old ways and habits but simply make them look new with flashy tech.

In essence I feel the practical approaches to teacher engagement need to be aligned to a more strategic approach and reasoning for any change.
February 25, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterDoug Woods
Hi, Doug, yes, I agree with all you say, but I htink you have made my intentions much clearer. I couldn't agree more with your last point, which is why in fact I said in the article that teacher engagement is one of several factors. What I'd meant to say, but forgot, was that the factors all interact with each other, which is what I was getting at in a way when I said that etacher engagement is a conglomeration of factors.

But when you say teacher engagement may not be that easy, I thihjnk if it is dealt with in a strategic way, it should be. Not simple, perhaps, but definitely easy!
February 25, 2010 | Registered CommenterTerry Freedman
"One way in which to achieve that is to make sure that the technology is used in a relevant way, and not merely for its own sake." I completely agree with this point, and feel that it is so often overlooked. I remember when I took classes that taught technology for it's own sake, and usually what I learned was completely useless within a couple years. Using technology to engage students, such as your example of Nintendo Dogs, is very important. Using it as a way to guide and assist learning in other areas is much more useful because it not only expands content area knowledge, it uses technology in real-world situations. Just as math is being taught in more real-world ways these days, the same should be true for technology. As with math, technology is not used in a vacuum, and so it should not be taught that way.

I also agree with the comment by Doug, when he talks about needing technology to transform current teaching practice. Kids today are so exposed to technology that it has changed the way they learn. It is harder for them to sit still for long periods, and since technology is somewhat responsible for that, it only makes sense that technology is used to teach (and reach) these modern students. And your point on teacher engagement cannot be overdone, it is the critical piece to this. So many ideas in education are forced on teachers, without giving them the proper training and assistance. They are usually left out of the decision-making process as well. Since teachers are the ones implementing technology in classrooms, they need to be part of the process from start to finish.
February 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterNoah Joseph
Thx, Noah, you've given some very helpful examples and insights. I think the idea of learning tech for its own sake has its place, but not exclusively!
March 1, 2010 | Registered CommenterTerry Freedman
I think you overlook the tech profile of the school. It's not just an individual thing.Where 3/4 of staff are tech minded and use ICT everyday in a variety of ways, they will easily learn from each other almost by osmosis. Where a critcical mass has not been achieved - eg <10% are tech minded, you will encounter more resistance. The SMT profile will interact with the staff tech profile. You can work to motivate individuals but the bottom line is the school profile, not pockets of excellence etc
the profile can in fact be self reinforcing- eg cutting edge teachers want to work in cutting edge schools, and some schools haven't yet entered the 20th century let alone the 21st....
March 3, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterdavid
Once again, I agree with you, David. Except: I personally have always found it not cost-effective in terms of time and energy to work with really relectuntant teachers. Also, do you think a school should RELY on osmosis? What about in a split-site school, for instance? I think schools can be proactive in helping to spread good practice. I agree with you about pockets of excellence though. I'll need to give this some thought: at the moment I am heading to a conference where I'm giving a preso. Thx for your ongoiing comments -- they are keeping me on my toes!
March 4, 2010 | Registered CommenterTerry Freedman

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.